Master's Thesis

Enhancing resilience in education: An econometric study of pedagogical strategies

Gabriel Gioia Ávila Oliveira2024

Key information

Authors:

Gabriel Gioia Ávila Oliveira (Gabriel Gioia Ávila Oliveira)

Supervisors:

Maria da Conceição Andrade e Silva; Miguel Alves Pereira (Miguel Alves Pereira)

Published in

July 9, 2024

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of various teaching strategies on student resilience while focusing on socioeconomically disadvantaged students, first-generation immigrants, and second-generation immigrants, using data from the PISA 2018 and TALIS 2018 databases. Employing multiple regression models, the study evaluates the significance of teaching approaches — Teacher Directed Learning, Cognitive Activation, Formative Assessment, and Student-Oriented Approaches — across four academic subjects: Mathematics, Reading, Science, and a composite Global measure. The results reveal that the Formative Assessment Approach positively influences resilience across all student groups, particularly first-generation immigrants, indicating its potential to promote equity in education. Conversely, the Cognitive Activation Approach shows a strong negative effect on the resilience of socioeconomically disadvantaged students, suggesting it is unsuitable for this demographic. The Teacher-Directed Learning Approach positively impacts the mathematics resilience of socioeconomically disadvantaged students, highlighting the need for targeted strategies. The study also identifies that the Student-Teacher Ratio is statistically irrelevant in explaining resilience, while socioeconomic status (ESCS) consistently proves to be a significant determinant across all models. Despite these findings, the study acknowledges several limitations, including the cross-sectional nature of the data, potential multicollinearity, and the constraints of variable selection. Overall, this research contributes to understanding how different teaching strategies can either mitigate or exacerbate educational inequities, offering insights for policymakers and educators aiming to foster more inclusive educational environments. Future research should address the identified limitations and expand the scope to include longitudinal data and additional contextual variables.

Publication details

Authors in the community:

Supervisors of this institution:

Fields of Science and Technology (FOS)

other-engineering-and-technologies - Other engineering and technologies

Publication language (ISO code)

eng - English

Rights type:

Embargo lifted

Date available:

April 18, 2025

Institution name

Instituto Superior Técnico